A public-source argument.

The project draws on public government programs and budgets, housing policy, forestry context, softwood lumber and mass timber material, infrastructure finance, procurement policy, and research on construction delivery and industrial capacity.

The full book carries the deeper chapter-level evidence. This page exists to make the source posture plain: the proposal is a synthesis of public knowledge, not a private dataset or commissioned study.

The central frame is designed to connect current federal priorities: Build Canada Homes, Buy Canadian procurement, softwood lumber, mass timber, major projects, public infrastructure, housing supply, and sovereign capital. These program names, mandates, and authorities should be refreshed against official sources before formal reuse.

The point is not to replace those commitments. It is to show how they can become one operating model.

This is a living civic proposal. Figures, program names, technical standards, and institutional mandates should be checked against current source material before reuse in formal policy or investment decisions.

Corrections, stronger sources, and serious objections are part of the work.

The briefing package also has a dedicated claim-to-source bundle for people evaluating or reusing the proposal.